User talk:StElmosFire574
Re: Starfish Staff
Hi! First of all, thank you for contributing to the wiki. Until recently, I've been pretty much on my own here trying to clean up the wiki over the years, so there are a lot of sections that simply need more input from other players so that accurate information is presented.
As for the recent edit, apologies as it looks like there was some confusion. I'm not sure why, but I did not see any additional information regarding the amount of focus restored when I rolled back the edit. I was only cleaning up the extraneous opinion that was previously added to the bottom of the page - there is a comment section on each article for those kinds of discussions now. I only wanted to update the link. Going back through the article history, I can see where you've added "Restores 4 focus to a single party member". I would restore the edit for you, but that is a bit confusing as you've stated you know it restores focus but not the number (although I'm inclined to agree with your assessment of 4). Without any additional information beyond "Calm II restores focus", there isn't really anything to say - additionally, this information is more pertinent to the Calm II page itself, which is only a stub so far.
Rather than create a bunch of empty stub articles with no information, links are added as pages are created for future updates. As this is an open fandom wiki, feel free to create the Calm II article yourself once you've gathered the pertinent information. There are several other pages that already exist which can be used as a template, but if you are new to editing on Fandom I would suggest familiarizing yourself with how it works so it's easier to understand how to transfer that info from page to page. Because the For The King wiki is a migrated wiki from Gamepedia, our editing is a bit unique - you can learn more here and here.
Once you've gotten enough information from the game and finished filling out the Calm II stub article, you can then update the appropriate sections on other articles as well, such as the tables on the Abilities page (you can also see how other people have set up individual ability pages from there). As well, you can take a look at other weapon articles to see how they are formatted, to give you an idea of how information is presented in articles. I know it isn't entirely consistent, but if you could keep to as similar a format as other articles as you can, that would be beneficial to the wiki as a whole. Unfortunately there has been a distinct lack of editors on the wiki over the years, and I've been pretty much on my own, so any useful edits are appreciated. If you are uncertain of how to do something or whether or not an edit is necessary, do it anyway and I can tidy it up behind you. Thanks.